November 8, 2003
-
I got two other eye comments! I'm probably making a ridiculously big deal out of it, but it's one of the only things that is boosting my self-worth right now. At least that I can perceive. Maybe I'm just really dense, and not attuned to my surroundings. See, more negativity.
I failed to mention that I went to proxy a couple of King Law School classes on Thursday. I attended a Contracts course and a Criminal Law course. Really interesting. I miss the classroom environment, the analysis, the thinking, and productivity. I feel like I picked up on the lecture right away, although I didn't do the reading.
In the Criminal Law course, a question was posed by the professor that was a real brain tease. It was set up by this scenario. People claim that all lives are equally valuable in the eyes of the law. Murder is a violent crime that is punishable by law. However, in an instance of self-defense, if, in the act of defending oneself, or another, and a murder should occur, it would not be a crime. It makes sense right? Here is the twist. If it is okay to kill a man who is attacking you, then his life must not be as valuable as someone who is not attacking you. I never saw it in that way. I always thought that self-defense was simply a natural reaction in order for one to survive. Yet, even in the eyes of the law, where murder is a crime, murder for the sake of self defense is not.
Recent Comments