I just made my flight and hotel reservations for Hawaii, and I just finished editing the paper that I'm going to present. I even signed myself up for a historic Oahu tour. Excited I am, yes! If anyone wants to meet me there, I'll be there June 27 - July 2. It should definitely be a great time, and I get to do some academic work to mix in with the social time. I always have to possess some really productive time. It's just the way I am.
Having said that, I need to speak on the immigration issue. It has been brought to our doorstep today because of elitism, 9/11 and homeland security, and the economy. A major argument is that immigrants take jobs and resources from Americans. Note that I didn't distinguish between legal and illegal immigrants, simply because the rhetoric has typically included anyone that can be singled out as different. An intellectual conversation would consistently distinguish the illegal from legal, but that distinction is rarely made. The ultra-conservative want to close off the borders completely, which would be completely different from what is going on right now, with the lack of border control going on. In reality, American immigration policy is jacked up and inconsistent. This creates an issue with perceived security. That's a no-no in post 9/11 America.
Elitism. All through history, America has perceived its people more civilized than the civilizations than they replaced, and sought to "enhance" them. The American Indians, the Mexicans, the Cubans, the Filipinos, the Vietnamese, etc. The strange thing is that first contact leads to lasting contact, and immigration. When immigrants are needed, things are dandy. As soon as outside circumstances take a turn for the worse, then immigrants are attacked. Immigrants are easily uidentified and labeled as expendable and pushed aside. The real issue, however, is power, be that monetary, social, political, etc. Immigrants have always been attacked to make mainstream America feel better that the government is doing something to keep them "safe."
Politicians play a dangerous game. They cater to their constituents for votes and they cater to big business for resources. Consituents don't like immigrants providing cheap labor and big business likes cheap labor. Democracy is supposed to be rule by the people. Who has the upper-hand here? I'd say capital. Globalization and the existence of capitalism have created impoverished situations in other countries so that they can be exploited of their natural resources, particularly their people, for cheap labor.
Immigrants are willing to work jobs for less pay and business knows this. They've created it. They can get away with using cheap labor and outsourcing jobs to countries where there is an abundance of cheap labor. Go to a restaurant in the Philippines and you may see 15-20 people bussing tables. I didn't have to throw away my own trash because a worker was already next to me to do that. There was practically one for each table.
It is so economically deprived in these countries that pennies are better than the underdevelopment that they get at home. There is this sociological term phrase - "The development of underdevelopment." Basically, the powerful countries develop the less powerful countries to be dependent. So conditions are bad and people leave to the more affluent country. Immigration. America has practically brought it upon itself. But it wasn't a decision made by democracy. It was a decision made by capital.
Business has gotten so powerful and so into itself that it doesn't matter if immigrants and Americans don't want to do their work. The work will get outsourced. Auntie Sorcy asked last year if the time would come that more people would leave America than come in. It's an intriguing question. People go where work is. When students are about to graduate many of them say, "I'll go where work takes me." Theoretically then, Americans, as well as the citizens of other countries, will flock to where businesses take their work. Drive out the immigrants, drive out the businesses, and being an outflow of immigration. This immigration issue? It's not about the people. It's about the businesses. Multi-national conglomerate businesses.
Recent Comments